Why Charities Can’t Ignore Regular Giving Reactivations

Tim Paris – 8 July 2020

It’s tempting to judge the success of an acquisition program by simply looking at how many new donors signed up. The more donors the better, right? The reality is a bit more complicated. The better question to ask is: for how long did each donor continue giving?

When you factor in acquisition costs (e.g. data costs, calling costs, or other services like face-to-face suppliers), regular givers who cancel within the first six, twelve or even 18 months might actually end up costing the charity money. Attrition rates (i.e. the percentage of donors that churn per month) are therefore critical for a successful program.

Dataro recently compared attrition rates between newly acquired regular givers and reactivated regular givers across a broad range of charities. The results showed that reactivating a lapsed giver tends to deliver better long term value than acquiring a new one.

Interesting insights include:

  • 42% of new donors typically churn within the first 12 months, compared to just 32% of reactivators.
  • After 24 months, 57% of new donors have typically churned, compared to 47% of reactivators.

Of course, results will vary from organisation to organisation, but the trend in this analysis is clear.

Acquisition and retention are opposite sides of the same coin and both are critical for growing a healthy regular giving program. But this analysis confirms charities should pay close attention to how long donors acquired from different programs are retained. Why do some donors churn more quickly than others? Such insights can help to develop a more focussed acquisition and retention strategy. It also shows that failing to focus on reactivations is a missed opportunity to re-engage with potential long-term supporters.

Dataro supports charities in identifying which lapsed regular givers are the most likely to reactivate each month with our machine learning CRM integrations. For instance, we recently helped a major children’s charity improve reactivations by 40%. This analysis further demonstrates the long term value of these reactivated regular givers.

To find out how we helped increase reactivations, feel free to get in touch.

Testimonials

“Dataro is completely reinventing how we use data in our fundraising. These guys are one of the most exciting things to happen in the industry for years.

Liesha Hanekroot Fundraising Manager

“I’m really impressed with the results we had for Christmas! It brings me so much joy to know that we’re contacting the right people...and that we can get better and more efficient about this over time! Data has never been easier to manage!

Amelia Szulerecka Senior Fundraising Manager

“The thing that stood out for me the most was that we are able to be proactive in our retention strategies instead of reactive. I don’t know a simpler and more accurate way than Dataro propensity scores to determine who and when to contact RGs for better retention.

Andrew Jung F2F & Telemarketing Manager

“We tested Dataro's propensity scores in our 2020 Tax Appeal and the results speak for themselves. We were able to raise more funds and reduce our costs. We're now rolling out Dataro's propensity scores across all of our appeals and regular giving programs.

Daniel Blucher Data & Insights Specialist