Audience Simulator
Traditional targeting leaves high-intent donors off the list.
Most targeting runs on wealth screening, RFM or a single org’s data. Try the models to see how Dataro ranks the same donors by propensity and intent, and who the old methods leave behind.
How to use the tool: Choose a model to compare rankings.
No model
Wealth screening
RFM
Single-org model
Dataro
The takeaway
The ranking method determines who makes the list.
The simulator holds contact volume steady and changes only the ranking method. That isolates the real targeting decision: which donors make the list when the budget cannot cover everyone.
Wealth screening estimates who has financial capacity. RFM summarizes who gave before. A single-org model learns from one organisation’s history. Dataro ranks who is most likely to act now by combining propensity and intent.
That ranking gives the team a smaller, higher-confidence audience. It turns the next campaign, appeal, or program into a clearer decision about who to focus on and what to do next.
Method comparison
Each method sees a different part of donor readiness.
Many teams already use RFM, wealth screening, or both. Those methods are useful.
The difference is the question each approach can answer and the donors it can still miss.
Wealth screening
Good at
Estimating financial capacity and identifying people who may be able to give more.
Where it falls short
Capacity is not the same as readiness. A wealthy donor may still have low interest in the next ask.
What it can miss
Donors with strong intent whose wealth signals are limited, old, or unavailable.
RFM
Good at
Summarising recent, frequent, and higher-value giving in a simple score.
Where it falls short
It describes past transactions and can over-rank donors whose previous behaviour has cooled.
What it can miss
People with current intent that is not visible in their last gifts alone.
Single-org models
Good at
Learning patterns specific to one organization’s file and fundraising history.
Where it falls short
It can only learn from the volume, variation, and outcomes in that one file.
What it can miss
Broader patterns that can improve confidence when local data is sparse.
Good at
Ranking each donor’s propensity to take a specific action and surfacing intent.
Where it falls short
It depends on connected donor data and a clearly defined fundraising objective.
What it can miss
No model removes uncertainty. The advantage is a clearer priority order, not a promise that every prediction converts.
Customer results
Sharper rankings help teams raise more while contacting fewer donors.
When the ranking gets sharper, teams can contact fewer people and still improve the result.
Bat Conservation International
UNICEF Australia
Integrations
Dataro adds predictive ranking without replacing your CRM.
Dataro sits on top of your CRM and existing donor data as a predictive layer. It adds ranked recommendations without asking your team to replace the systems or workflows already in place.
Dataro complements the targeting tools teams already use.
Answers about how Dataro compares with wealth screening, RFM, and single-org models.
How is Dataro different from wealth screening?
Wealth screening estimates financial capacity. Dataro ranks each donor’s likelihood to take a specific action using propensity and intent. Capacity helps explain who could give, while propensity helps decide who to contact now.
Does Dataro replace RFM?
No. Many teams use RFM, and it remains useful for summarising recency, frequency, and monetary value. Dataro adds a predictive ranking across more signals, which can surface ready donors that historical scoring alone can miss.
How is Dataro different from a model trained on one organization’s data?
A single-org model learns only from the volume, variation and outcomes in that organization’s history. Dataro adds a broader predictive layer to the organization’s own data so the ranking can be more confident when local signals are limited.
Can I use Dataro with my CRM?
Yes. Dataro sits on top of your existing CRM and donor data. It returns ranked recommendations, so your team can keep its current systems and workflows.
What do propensity and intent mean in this simulator?
Propensity is the likelihood that a donor will take a specific action. Intent is evidence that the donor is ready to act now. Dataro uses both to rank who should move to the top of the audience.

